Urgent Update: Fremont’s Morrison Canyon Road Blocked by New Gate

UPDATE: A new twist in the ongoing conflict over public access to Morrison Canyon Road in Fremont has emerged, as rancher Christopher George has erected a gate that blocks the roadway, igniting fierce opposition from the City of Fremont. This development comes just weeks after the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted to transfer control of the 0.2-mile stretch of road to George.

The gate was installed following the board’s unanimous decision last month, which George argued was necessary for his family’s safety. He highlighted concerns about illegal activities occurring on the road, claiming it has been a hotspot for drug dealing and other crimes. However, the city’s attorney, Rafael Alvarado Jr., swiftly rejected George’s claims, asserting in a letter dated November 6, 2025, that the gate is an illegal obstruction on public land.

“For the past 70 years, the public has used and enjoyed the roadway as a public right of way,” Alvarado stated, emphasizing the ongoing public access that has been historically recognized. The city is demanding that George remove the barrier immediately, citing that he lacks the authority to restrict access to what they consider a public road.

The controversy stretches back nearly two decades, beginning in 2008 when George and a neighbor filed a lawsuit regarding road conditions. The ensuing settlement resulted in significant improvements to the roadway, costing the East Bay Regional Park District and the city hundreds of thousands of dollars. Despite this, George has maintained his position that the last segment of the road should be designated as his private property.

George, who is also the CEO of CMG Financial, has claimed the road is unsafe for public use, citing issues with traffic and pedestrian safety. “This provides a buffer for us of safety,” George told the board, framing the gate as a necessary protective measure for his family and the community.

County officials, including Public Works Director Daniel Woldesenbet, have echoed George’s sentiments, describing the road as functioning more like a private driveway, despite its maintenance by the county. Woldesenbet noted that the county had spent over $200,000 in road maintenance over the past five years, and expressed concern over the road’s deteriorating condition.

While George’s advocates view the move as a justified step toward safety, critics have labeled it as an unjustified seizure of public land. Jason Bezis, an attorney representing local residents against George’s claim, described the gate installation as “brazen” and a clear violation of public access laws. “The law is very clear on this,” Bezis asserted.

Fremont residents have also voiced their frustrations, arguing that the road is a vital public asset that should remain accessible. “When we lose public spaces, we end up having to buy the same amenities,” said Kelly Abreu, a local advocate. “This is not an amenity; it’s a public asset.”

As tensions rise, the Fremont city attorney has vowed to monitor the situation closely, warning that legal action will be pursued if the gate is not removed. As of Wednesday evening, the gate remains in place, further escalating the conflict between George and city officials.

The community is now left to wonder what the next steps will be in this contentious battle over public access. With the city poised to take action, residents are rallying to ensure their voices are heard, emphasizing the importance of keeping public spaces open for all. This story is developing, and more updates are expected as the situation unfolds.