Jack Smith Confirms ‘Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt’ Against Trump

UPDATE: Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith has just revealed to lawmakers that his team possesses “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” that Donald Trump criminally conspired to overturn the results of the 2020 election. This shocking statement was made during a closed-door interview with the House Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2025.

Smith’s assertions come amid mounting pressure as investigators have reportedly gathered “powerful evidence” indicating that Trump unlawfully hoarded classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. He also faces allegations of obstructing government efforts to retrieve these documents.

“I made my decisions in the investigation without regard to President Trump’s political association,” Smith stated emphatically, underscoring his commitment to justice over politics. “We took actions based on what the facts and the law required.”

During the deposition, Smith addressed two major investigations into Trump which previously resulted in abandoned criminal charges. This marks his first opportunity to answer lawmakers’ questions regarding these probes since being subpoenaed earlier this month. Smith’s team had been investigating Trump’s attempts to overturn the election and his handling of classified materials.

“Jack is showing tremendous courage in light of the remarkable and unprecedented retribution campaign against him by this administration,” said Smith’s attorney, Lanny Breuer, highlighting the challenges faced by the special counsel.

In an unexpected twist, Trump expressed his support for a public hearing, stating, “I’d rather see him testify publicly. There’s no way he can answer the questions.” This comment has fueled speculation about the upcoming legal battles.

Smith’s testimony is anticipated to clarify several mischaracterizations regarding his investigations, particularly concerning the analysis of phone records from select GOP lawmakers around January 6, 2021. These records included details about call lengths but not the contents, raising questions about privacy and legal boundaries.

Since his appointment in 2022, Smith has guided the DOJ’s inquiries into Trump’s election interference and the mishandling of classified documents. Notably, he filed charges in both investigations before abandoning them after Trump’s return to the White House, citing legal principles that a sitting president cannot be indicted.

As this situation develops, all eyes are on Smith’s next steps and how the findings will shape the ongoing political landscape. With both investigations under intense scrutiny, the implications for Trump and the future of his political ambitions are profound.

Stay tuned for further updates as we continue to monitor this developing story.